• AQTESOLV Home
  • Aquifer Testing 101
  • Hydraulic Properties

Representative Values of Hydraulic Properties

by Glenn M. Duffield, President, HydroSOLVE, Inc.

  • Hydraulic Conductivity
  • Transmissivity
  • Anisotropy
  • Storativity
  • Specific Yield
  • Porosity

Aquifer tests (pumping tests, slug tests and constant-head tests) are performed to estimate site-specific values for the hydraulic properties of aquifers and aquitards. Under certain circumstances, however, site-specific hydraulic property data may not be available when needed. For example, reconnaissance studies or scoping calculations may require hydraulic property values before on-site investigations are performed.

The following sections present representative hydraulic property values reported in the literature for horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity, storativity, specific yield and porosity. Refer to these values if site-specific data are unavailable for your study or to check the results of field and laboratory tests conducted at an investigation site.

NewTry out the interactive calculators for estimating hydraulic conductivity from grain size, specific storage and storativity!

Hydraulic
Conductivity (K)

Hydraulic conductivity
Hydraulic conductivity is the rate of flow under a unit hydraulic gradient through a unit cross-sectional area of aquifer (opening A). Transmissivity is the rate of flow under a unit hydraulic gradient through a unit width of aquifer of thickness m (opening B). Diagram from Ferris et al. (1962).

Hydraulic conductivity is a measure of a material's capacity to transmit water. It is defined as a constant of proportionality relating the specific discharge of a porous medium under a unit hydraulic gradient in Darcy's law:

ν=-Ki

where ν is specific discharge [L/T], K is hydraulic conductivity [L/T] and i is hydraulic gradient [dimensionless]. Coefficient of permeability is another term for hydraulic conductivity.

Note that hydraulic conductivity, which is a function of water viscosity and density, is in a strict sense a function of water temperature; however, given the small range of temperature variation encountered in most groundwater systems, the temperature dependence of hydraulic conductivity is often neglected.

Transmissivity is the rate of flow under a unit hydraulic gradient through a unit width of aquifer of given saturated thickness. The transmissivity of an aquifer is related to its hydraulic conductivity as follows:

T=Kb

where T is transmissivity [L2/T] and b is aquifer thickness [L].

Representative Values

The following tables show representative values of hydraulic conductivity for various unconsolidated sedimentary materials, sedimentary rocks and crystalline rocks (from Domenico and Schwartz 1990):

Unconsolidated Sedimentary Materials
Material Hydraulic Conductivity
(m/sec)
Gravel 3×10-4 to 3×10-2
Coarse sand 9×10-7 to 6×10-3
Medium sand 9×10-7 to 5×10-4
Fine sand 2×10-7 to 2×10-4
Silt, loess 1×10-9 to 2×10-5
Till 1×10-12 to 2×10-6
Clay 1×10-11 to 4.7×10-9
Unweathered marine clay 8×10-13 to 2×10-9

Sedimentary Rocks
Rock Type Hydraulic Conductivity
(m/sec)
Karst and reef limestone 1×10-6 to 2×10-2
Limestone, dolomite 1×10-9 to 6×10-6
Sandstone 3×10-10 to 6×10-6
Siltstone 1×10-11 to 1.4×10-8
Salt 1×10-12 to 1×10-10
Anhydrite 4×10-13 to 2×10-8
Shale 1×10-13 to 2×10-9

Crystalline Rocks
Material Hydraulic Conductivity
(m/sec)
Permeable basalt 4×10-7 to 2×10-2
Fractured igneous and metamorphic rock 8×10-9 to 3×10-4
Weathered granite 3.3×10-6 to 5.2×10-5
Weathered gabbro 5.5×10-7 to 3.8×10-6
Basalt 2×10-11 to 4.2×10-7
Unfractured igneous and metamorphic rock 3×10-14 to 2×10-10

To Convert Multiply By To Obtain
m/sec 100 cm/sec
m/sec 2.12×106 gal/day/ft2
m/sec 3.2808 ft/sec
Hydraulic conductivity of geologic materials
Hydraulic conductivity of selected consolidated and unconsolidated geologic materials (from Heath 1983).

Grain Size Relationships

A number of empirical formulas, some dating back over a century, have been proposed which attempt to relate the hydraulic conductivity of an unconsolidated geologic material (granular sediment or soil) to its grain size distribution obtained from sieve analysis. While these formulas can be useful as a first approximation of K, one should bear in mind that their generality is limited by a number of factors including the following:

  1. the number of sediment samples used to develop the formula
  2. the geologic environment(s) comprising the samples used to develop the formula
  3. the range of grain size assumed for the formula
  4. the uniformity of grain size assumed for the formula
Grain size distribution
Grain size distribution plot for sieve analysis of sand sample with D10=0.32 mm, D60=0.89 mm and porosity=0.27 (Kresic 1997).

Equations for estimating K from grain size commonly use two metrics from a grain size distribution plot: D10, the grain diameter for which 10% of the sample is finer (90% is coarser), and D60, the grain diameter for which 60% of the sample is finer (40% is coarser). D10 is frequently taken as the effective diameter of the sample while the ratio CU = D60/D10 is known as the coefficient of uniformity.

The following calculator uses formulas by Hazen, Kozeny-Carmen, Beyer and Wang et al. to estimate K from grain size and porosity data.

Data For Computing K From Grain Size Distribution
D10 = mm
D60 = mm
Total Porosity (n) = [-]
Gravitational Acceleration (g) = m/s²
Kinematic Viscosity (ν) = m²/s
1 inch = 25.4 mm
g = 9.8 m/s²
ν = 1.2×10-6 m²/s at 13°C (55°F)

Hydraulic Conductivity (K) Estimated From Grain Size Data
D10 = mm
D60 = mm
CU = [-]
n = [-]
g = m/s²
ν = m²/s
Method K (m/s) K (cm/s) K (ft/d)
Hazen1 (KH)
Kozeny-Carmen2 (KKC)
Beyer3 (KB)
Wang et al.4 (KW)
Average
Minimum
Maximum
Max/Min
10.1 mm ≤ D10 ≤ 3 mm; CU ≤ 5
2silts, sands and gravelly sands
30.06 mm ≤ D10 ≤ 0.6 mm; 1 ≤ CU ≤ 20
40.05 mm ≤ D10 ≤ 0.83 mm; 0.09 mm ≤ D60 ≤ 4.29 mm; 1.3 ≤ CU ≤ 18.3

Hazen Formula

Hazen (1892; 1911) developed a simple formula for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of a saturated sand from its grain size distribution:

K H = C H D 10 2

where KH is hydraulic conductivity [cm/s], CH is an empirical coefficient equal to 100 cm‑1s‑1 and D10 is measured in cm.

As reported by Carrier (2003), CH is most commonly given as 100 but published values range over two orders of magnitude from 1 to 1000 cm‑1s‑1. The Hazen formula is assumed valid for 0.1 mm ≤ D10 ≤ 3 mm and CU ≤ 5 (Kresic 1997).

Kozeny-Carmen Formula

An equation attributed to Kozeny and Carmen (Freeze and Cherry 1979; Rosas et al. 2014) may be used to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of sediments and soils:

K K C = C K C g ν n 3 1 - n 2 D 10 2

where KKC is hydraulic conductivity [m/s], CKC is an empirical coefficient equal to 1/180 [dimensionless], g is gravitational acceleration [m/s²], ν is kinematic viscosity of water [m²/s] and n is total porosity [dimensionless]. D10 is measured in m.

The Kozeny-Carmen formula is assumed valid for sediments and soils composed of silt, sand and gravelly sand (Rosas et al. 2014).

Beyer Formula

Beyer (1964) also proposed a simple relationship for estimating hydraulic conductivity from a sediment's grain size distribution:

K B = C B g ν ln 500 D 60 / D 10 D 10 2

where KB is hydraulic conductivity [m/s], CB is an empirical coefficient equal to 6×10-4 [dimensionless], g is gravitational acceleration [m/s²] and ν is kinematic viscosity of water [m²/s]. D10 and D60 are measured in m.

The Beyer formula is assumed valid for 0.06 mm ≤ D10 ≤ 0.6 mm and 1 ≤ CU ≤ 20 (Kresic 1997).

Wang Et Al. Formula

Wang et al. (2017) developed another empirical formula for estimating hydraulic conductivity from the grain size distribution of a sediment or soil:

K W = C W g ν log g D 60 3 ν 2 -1 D 10 2

where KW is hydraulic conductivity [m/s], CW is an empirical coefficient equal to 2.9×10-3 [dimensionless], g is gravitational acceleration [m/s²] and ν is kinematic viscosity of water [m²/s]. D10 and D60 are measured in m.

The Wang et al. formula is developed from a dataset (Rosas et al. 2014) characterized by 0.05 mm ≤ D10 ≤ 0.83 mm, 0.09 mm ≤ D60 ≤ 4.29 mm and 1.3 ≤ CU ≤ 18.3.

Hydraulic Conductivity Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr)

An anisotropy ratio relates hydraulic conductivities in different directions. For example, vertical-to-horizontal hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio is given by Kz/Kr where Kz is vertical hydraulic conductivity [L/T] and Kr is radial (horizontal) hydraulic conductivity [L/T]. Anisotropy in a horizontal plane is given by Kx/Ky where Kx and Ky are horizontal hydraulic conductivities in the x and y directions, respectively [L/T].

Todd (1980) reports values of Kz/Kr ranging between 0.1 and 0.5 for alluvium and possibly as low as 0.01 when clay layers are present.

Representative Values

The following table shows representative values of horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivities for selected rock types (from Domenico and Schwartz 1990):

Material Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity
(m/sec)
Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity
(m/sec)
Anhydrite 10-14 to 10-12 10-15 to 10-13
Chalk 10-10 to 10-8 5×10-11 to 5×10-9
Limestone,
dolomite
10-9 to 10-7 5×10-10 to 5×10-8
Sandstone 5×10-13 to 10-10 2.5×10-13 to 5×10-11
Shale 10-14 to 10-12 10-15 to 10-13
Salt 10-14 10-14

Storativity (S)

Confined Aquifers

Storativity of a nonleaky confined aquifer
Storativity of a confined (artesian) aquifer (from Ferris et al. 1962).

The storativity of a confined aquifer (or aquitard) is defined as the volume of water released from storage per unit surface area of the aquifer or aquitard per unit decline in hydraulic head. Storativity is also known by the terms coefficient of storage and storage coefficient.

Pumping a well in a confined aquifer releases water from aquifer storage by two mechanisms: compression of the aquifer and expansion of water.

In a confined aquifer (or aquitard), storativity is defined as

S=Ssb

where S is storativity [dimensionless], Ss is specific storage [L-1] and b is aquifer (or aquitard) thickness [L].

The typical storativity of a confined aquifer, which varies with specific storage and aquifer thickness, ranges from 5×10-5 to 5×10-3 (Todd 1980).

Specific storage is the volume of water that a unit volume of aquifer (or aquitard) releases from storage under a unit decline in head. Specific storage is related to the compressibilities of water and the aquifer (or aquitard) as follows:

Ss=ρgα+ nβ

where ρ is mass density of water (= 1000 kg/m³) [M/L³], g is gravitational acceleration (= 9.8 m/sec²) [L/T²], α is aquifer (or aquitard) compressibility [T²L/M], n is total porosity [dimensionless], and β is compressibility of water (= 4.4×10-10 m sec²/kg or Pa-1) [T²L/M].

Unconfined Aquifers

Storativity of an unconfined (water-table) aquifer
Storativity of an unconfined (water-table) aquifer (from Ferris et al. 1962).

The storativity of an unconfined aquifer includes its specific yield or drainable porosity:

S=Sy+Ssb

where Sy is specific yield [dimensionless].

Lowering of the water table in an unconfined aquifer leads to the release of water stored in interstitial openings by gravity drainage.

Compared to gravity drainage, aquifer compression and water expansion in a water-table aquifer yield relatively little water from storage; hence, Sy≫Ssb and S≅Sy in unconfined aquifers.

Storativity in unconfined aquifers typically ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 (Lohman 1972).

Representative Values

The following table provides representative values of specific storage for various geologic materials (Domenico and Mifflin [1965] as reported in Batu [1998]):

Material Ss (ft-1)
Plastic clay 7.8×10-4 to 6.2×10-3
Stiff clay 3.9×10-4 to 7.8×10-4
Medium hard clay 2.8×10-4 to 3.9×10-4
Loose sand 1.5×10-4 to 3.1×10-4
Dense sand 3.9×10-5 to 6.2×10-5
Dense sandy gravel 1.5×10-5 to 3.1×10-5
Rock, fissured 1×10-6 to 2.1×10-5
Rock, sound < 1×10-6

To Convert Divide By To Obtain
ft-1 0.3048 m-1

Freeze and Cherry (1979) provided the following compressibility values for various aquifer materials:

Material Compressibility, α (m2/N or Pa-1)
Clay 10-8 to 10-6
Sand 10-9 to 10-7
Gravel 10-10 to 10-8
Jointed rock 10-10 to 10-8
Sound rock 10-11 to 10-9

Pa-1 = m2/N = m sec2/kg

Example Calculations
  1. Use compressibility data to estimate the storativity of a 35-ft thick confined sand aquifer (assume ρ = 1000 kg/m3 and n = 0.3).

    S=Ssb=ρgα+ nβb = (1000 kg/m3)(9.8 m/sec2) [10-8 m2/N + (0.3) (4.4×10-10 m2/N)](35 ft)(0.3048 m/ft) = 1.1×10-3

    How much does the expansion of water contribute to the total storativity in this example?

    Sw=ρgnβb = (1000 kg/m3)(9.8 m/sec2)(0.3)(4.4×10-10 m2/N)(35 ft)(0.3048 m/ft) = 1.4×10-5

  2. Use specific storage data to estimate storativity for the same confined sand aquifer given in the preceding example.

    S=Ssb = (5×10-5 ft-1)(35 ft) = 1.8×10-3

Specific Storage Calculator

Ss=ρgα+ nβ

Enter values for aquifer compressibility and porosity to compute specific storage.

Compute Specific Storage
Aquifer Compressibility (α) = m²/N
Total Porosity (n) = dimensionless
Density of Water (ρ) = kg/m³
Gravitational Acceleration (g) = m/sec²
Water Compressibility (β) = m²/N
Specific Storage (Ss) = m-1

Storativity Calculator

S=Ssb=ρgα+ nβb

Enter values for aquifer compressibility, porosity and thickness to compute storativity.

Compute Storativity
Aquifer Compressibility (α) = m²/N
Total Porosity (n) = dimensionless
Aquifer Thickness (b) = m
Density of Water (ρ) = kg/m³
Gravitational Acceleration (g) = m/sec²
Water Compressibility (β) = m²/N
Storativity (S) = dimensionless

Specific Yield (Sy)

Specific retention, specific yield and total porosity
Specific retention (Sr), specific yield (Sy) and total porosity (n) (from Heath 1983).

Specific yield is defined as the volume of water released from storage by an unconfined aquifer per unit surface area of aquifer per unit decline of the water table.

Bear (1979) relates specific yield to total porosity as follows:

n=Sy+Sr

where n is total porosity [dimensionless], Sy is specific yield [dimensionless] and Sr is specific retention [dimensionless], the amount of water retained by capillary forces during gravity drainage of an unconfined aquifer. Thus, specific yield, which is sometimes called effective porosity, is less than the total porosity of an unconfined aquifer (Bear 1979).

Representative Values

Heath (1983) reports the following values (in percent by volume) for porosity, specific yield and specific retention:

Material Porosity (%) Specific
Yield (%)
Specific
Retention (%)
Soil 55 40 15
Clay 50 2 48
Sand 25 22 3
Gravel 20 19 1
Limestone 20 18 2
Sandstone (unconsolidated) 11 6 5
Granite 0.1 0.09 0.01
Basalt (young) 11 8 3

The following table shows representative values of specific yield for various geologic materials (from Morris and Johnson 1967):

Material Specific Yield (%)
Gravel, coarse 21
Gravel, medium 24
Gravel, fine 28
Sand, coarse 30
Sand, medium 32
Sand, fine 33
Silt 20
Clay 6
Sandstone, fine grained 21
Sandstone, medium grained 27
Limestone 14
Dune sand 38
Loess 18
Peat 44
Schist 26
Siltstone 12
Till, predominantly silt 6
Till, predominantly sand 16
Till, predominantly gravel 16
Tuff 21

Porosity (n)

Void volume, total volume and porosity
Void volume, total volume and porosity (from Heath 1983).

Porosity is defined as the void space of a rock or unconsolidated material:

n=Vv/Vt

where n is porosity [dimensionless], Vv is void volume [L3] and Vt is total volume [L3].

Representative Values

The following tables show representative porosity values for various unconsolidated sedimentary materials, sedimentary rocks and crystalline rocks (from Morris and Johnson 1967):

Unconsolidated Sedimentary Materials
Material Porosity (%)
Gravel, coarse 24 - 37
Gravel, medium 24 - 44
Gravel, fine 25 - 39
Sand, coarse 31 - 46
Sand, medium 29 - 49
Sand, fine 26 - 53
Silt 34 - 61
Clay 34 - 57

Sedimentary Rocks
Rock Type Porosity (%)
Sandstone 14 - 49
Siltstone 21 - 41
Claystone 41 - 45
Shale 1 - 10
Limestone 7 - 56
Dolomite 19 - 33

Crystalline Rocks
Rock Type Porosity (%)
Basalt 3 - 35
Weathered granite 34 - 57
Weathered gabbro 42 - 45

See also: Argonne National Laboratory, Wolff (1982)

Last update on Sat Nov 23 2019