• AQTESOLV Home
  • Tour
  • Solutions
  • Hantush (1960)

Hantush (1960) Solution for Leaky Confined Aquifers

  • Assumptions
  • Equations
  • Data requirements
  • Solution options
  • Estimated parameters
  • Curve matching tips
  • Benchmark
  • References

Related Solution Methods

  • Hantush and Jacob (1955)
  • Hantush and Jacob (1955) for step tests
  • Neuman and Witherspoon (1969)
  • Moench (1985)

Additional Topics

  • Full list of solution methods
  • Pumping test analysis
  • Recovery tests
  • Step-drawdown tests
Well configuration for pumping test in leaky confined aquifer with compressible aquitard

Mahdi S. HantushHantush (1960) published a mathematical solution that is useful for determining the hydraulic properties (transmissivity and storativity of pumped aquifer; vertical hydraulic conductivity and storage coefficient of aquitard) of leaky confined (semi-confined) aquifers.

Evaluation of aquifer properties involves matching the Hantush well function to water-level drawdown data collected during a pumping test (aquifer test). The solution assumes storage in leaky compressible aquitard(s) and also accounts for partially penetrating wells (Hantush 1961a,b).

You are not restricted to constant-rate tests with the Hantush solution. AQTESOLV incorporates the principle of superposition in time to simulate variable-rate and recovery tests with this method.

Assumptions

  • aquifer has infinite areal extent
  • aquifer is homogeneous, isotropic and of uniform thickness
  • control well is fully or partially penetrating
  • flow to control well is horizontal when control well is fully penetrating
  • aquifer is leaky confined
  • flow is unsteady
  • water is released instantaneously from storage with decline of hydraulic head
  • diameter of control well is very small so that storage in the well can be neglected
  • aquitards have infinite areal extent, uniform vertical hydraulic conductivity, storage coefficient and uniform thickness
  • aquitards are overlain or underlain by an infinite constant-head plane source
  • flow in the aquitards is vertical

Equations

Hantush (1960) derived an analytical solution for unsteady flow to a fully penetrating well in a homogeneous, isotropic leaky confined aquifer assuming aquitard storage. The Laplace transform solution is as follows:

s ¯ D = 2 K 0 x p (1) x = p + q ¯ D (2) q ¯ D = 4 p β ′ coth 4 p β ′ r / B ′ 2 + 4 p β ″ coth 4 p β ″ r / B ″ 2 (3) B ′ = T b ′ K ′ (4) B ″ = T b ″ K ″ (5) β ′ = r 4 K ′ S ′ b ′ T S (6) β ″ = r 4 K ″ S ″ b ″ T S (7) t D = T t S r 2 (8) s D = 4 π T Q s (9)

where

  • b′ is thickness of first aquitard [L]
  • b″ is thickness of second aquitard [L]
  • K′ is vertical hydraulic conductivity of first aquitard [L/T]
  • K″ is vertical hydraulic conductivity of second aquitard [L/T]
  • K0 is modified Bessel function of second kind, order zero
  • p is Laplace transform variable
  • Q is pumping rate [L³/T]
  • r is radial distance from pumping well to observation well [L]
  • s is drawdown [L]
  • S is storativity [dimensionless]
  • S′ is storativity of first aquitard [dimensionless]
  • S″ is storativity of second aquitard [dimensionless]
  • t is elapsed time since start of pumping [T]
  • T is transmissivity [L²/T]

Hantush (1960) also derived an asymptotic solution (H(u,β) well function) for drawdown in the pumped aquifer at short values of time:

s = Q 4 π T ∫ u ∞ e - y y erfc β u y y - u dy (10) u = r 2 S 4 T t (11) β = r 4 K ′ S ′ b ′ T S (12)

or

β = r 4 K ′ S ′ b ′ T S + K ″ S ″ b ″ T S (13)

The solution assumes small values of time, i.e., when t < b′S′/10K′ and t < b″S″/10K″.

The early-time approximate solution can be modified for partial penetrating wells and anisotropy using the approach of Hantush (1961a, b).

At large distances, the effect of partial penetration becomes negligible when

r > 1.5 b K r / K z (14)

where

  • b is aquifer thickness [L]
  • Kr is radial hydraulic conductivity of aquifer [L/T]
  • Kz is vertical hydraulic conductivity of aquifer [L/T]

Data Requirements

  • pumping and observation well locations
  • pumping rate(s)
  • observation well measurements (time and displacement)
  • partial penetration depths (optional)
  • saturated thickness (for partially penetrating wells)
  • hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio (for partially penetrating wells)

Solution Options

  • variable pumping rates
  • multiple pumping wells
  • multiple observation wells
  • partially penetrating pumping and observation wells
  • boundaries

Estimated Parameters

  • T (transmissivity)
  • S (storativity)
  • r/B′ (leakage parameter, first aquitard)
  • β′ (leakage parameter, first aquitard)
  • r/B″ (leakage parameter, second aquitard)
  • β″ (leakage parameter, second aquitard)

The Report view shows aquitard properties (K′/b′ and K′; K″/b″ and K″) computed from the leakage parameters (r/B′ and r/B″).

Early-Time Solution

  • T (transmissivity)
  • S (storativity)
  • β (leakage parameter)
  • Kz/Kr (hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio)
  • b (aquifer thickness)

Curve Matching Tips

  • Use the Cooper and Jacob (1946) solution to obtain preliminary estimates of aquifer properties.
  • Choose Match>Visual to perform visual curve matching using the procedure for type curve solutions.
  • Use active type curves for more effective visual matching with variable-rate pumping tests.
  • Select values of r/B, β and Kz/Kr from the Family and Curve drop-down lists on the toolbar.
  • Use parameter tweaking to perform visual curve matching and sensitivity analysis.
  • Perform visual curve matching prior to automatic estimation to obtain reasonable starting values for the aquifer properties.
  • For b < 0.5, all of the type curves in the early-time solution have a similar shape (Kruseman and de Ridder 1994); hence, it is often difficult to obtain a unique match with the early-time solution when 0 ≤ b ≤ 0.5.

Benchmark

AQTESOLV benchmark for Hantush (1960) solution for leaky confined aquifer
Comparison of AQTESOLV (blue line) and published Hantush (1960) well function data (symbols) for β=1.

References

Hantush, M.S., 1960. Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers, Jour. of Geophys. Res., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 3713-3725.

Hantush, M.S., 1961a. Drawdown around a partially penetrating well, Jour. of the Hyd. Div., Proc. of the Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., vol. 87, no. HY4, pp. 83-98.

Hantush, M.S., 1961b. Aquifer tests on partially penetrating wells, Jour. of the Hyd. Div., Proc. of the Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., vol. 87, no. HY5, pp. 171-194.